Barrington Police Officer Diane Pinto checks a motorist's license during a recent traffic stop in town. Photo by Richard Dionne.
BARRINGTON Barrington Police Chief John LaCross received a phone call on a recent weekday morning from a resident who was angry. The man said he was upset because his wife was stopped earlier that morning by local police and the officer had given her a ticket for speeding.
“She actually got a break,” said Chief LaCross. “She was only ticketed for five over ... the man was upset because she mentioned my name and still got the ticket. I said ‘You've got to be kidding. My friends don’t mention my name.’
“I know this person ... but if you get caught speeding, you get caught speeding.”
The long-time law enforcement officer — John LaCross was a Rhode Island State Police trooper for more than two decades before becoming Barrington’s chief — expects his officers to engage in traffic enforcement whenever they are not actively involved in an investigation, handling a complaint report or responding to some other police action.
“There are no ticket quotas,” he said, but “I do ask them (police officers) to stop a couple of cars during a shift.”
Chief LaCross said the officers are encouraged to use their discretion when ordering vehicle stops during traffic enforcement patrols and when deciding whether to issue tickets for violations. He added that there are benefits from the increased traffic enforcement.
“The more (police) lights you see, the more visibility for the department ... it’s taxpayers’ dollars at work. We want to show criminals that we’re out there. It can be a deterrent (to crime),” he said.
“It’s my upbringing from 33 years of law enforcement: you are accountable for eight hours of work a day. You are accountable for serving the public from the time you get on to the time you leave.”
Some residents feel that the department’s approach with active traffic enforcement borders on harassment — a point that was illustrated in November when a woman grew so frustrated during a traffic stop in town that she reportedly grabbed and broke the officer’s pen while he was issuing her a ticket. (She was subsequently charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and vandalism/malicious injury to property.)
Chief LaCross counters that many times officers are actually issuing lesser fines — or verbal warnings in many cases — for motorists who violate traffic laws.
“People need to realize that we’re out there to keep everyone safe,” he said. “If your (car’s) taillight is out and you get rear-ended, maybe we could have prevented that accident.
“If people are complaining, they should really look at their speedometer and see what speed they’re traveling. You shouldn’t be going 40 in a 25 ... everything is reduced in residential neighborhoods.”
The chief also said that routine traffic enforcement will often lead to the discovery of other infractions. For example, it has occurred in Barrington where a police officer may stop a car for speeding or not having a license plate light only to discover that the driver is intoxicated or that there’s an arrest warrant issued for the individual.
“If you’re a good cop you’re looking for probable cause to stop a vehicle, especially after midnight,” Chief LaCross said. “That’s what you’re being paid for.”
The chief said he believes aggressive traffic enforcement will lead to safer roadways and less crime in Barrington neighborhoods during the overnight hours. He pointed to numerous examples where alert police officers actively pursuing traffic enforcement pulled drunk drivers off local roadways.
Chief LaCross also said two of his best arrests while serving with the state police surfaced during routine traffic stops. He recalled the day he pulled a vehicle over to the side of the road because it did not have a front license plate, only to discover that the car had been stolen. The people inside the car, said the chief, had just kidnapped another man, brought him to an ATM and forced him to withdraw money from his account at knife-point. The suspects then brought the man into a wooded section of Cranston, stripped him of his clothes and tied him to a tree. They then pulled the license plates off the car, placed a different plate on the rear of the vehicle and were fleeing from the scene when Chief LaCross and another trooper noticed the car was lacking a front plate.
“We had them (the suspects) before the victim had even reported it,” he said.
Chief LaCross said safety is enhanced when police officers are active with traffic enforcement.
“You could be preventing a house-break ... shame on you (if you didn’t prevent a crime) because you didn’t want to stop someone.”
Each stop is different
Three-to-one. That’s the ratio of warnings issued for traffic violations to actual tickets written by Barrington police officers. Chief LaCross said the numbers might surprise some people, especially those who feel that the department’s approach teeters on harassment.
The chief also said that officers use discretion when handling each traffic stop.
“On an annual basis there are a lot more warnings issued than there are tickets,” he said. “Not all situations are the same. Every car stop is different.”
Strong support for police policy
Dan Converse makes no attempt to hide his bias — he fully supports the local police department’s policies concerning traffic enforcement.
The longtime resident said the Barrington Police Department has every right to take an assertive approach toward stopping vehicles for traffic and equipment violations: “The law is the law and you really can’t complain about it,” he said. “You break the law, you have to pay the consequences. You don’t wear your seat belt and you pay the consequences. Sometimes the worst kind.”
Mr. Converse’s leanings can be traced to a single car accident that took place in early November 2007. The accident, which occurred on New Meadow Road, claimed the life of Mr. Converse’s 16-year-old son, Jon. The young Barrington High School student was a passenger in a car that had been speeding down the road; the driver lost control of his car just south of the intersection with Massasoit Avenue and the vehicle slammed into a tree. Jon, who wasn’t wearing his seat belt, was the only one of the car’s four occupants who was killed.
Mr. Converse said he understands why people can sometimes grow frustrated when an officer stops them for speeding or rolling through a stop sign, but he believes frustrations aside, drivers need to follow the rules.
“If they could just see it from the other side, the preventative side,” he said. “The person who got stopped for the taillight out, you’ll never know if they would have gotten in a crash because of that taillight.
“I would not be talking to you right now if there had been an officer cruising New Meadow Road that night, if an officer had seen that car driving erratically. Maybe it would have made them slow down or maybe he would have pulled them over. ... Jon would be at college or at a job or at home sleeping right now.”
Mr. Converse has taken the painful experience of losing his son and tried to turn it into something positive. He frequently speaks at the Zero Fatalities Program at the ACI, sharing stories with high school-age kids in an effort to deter them from making bad decisions. He also speaks at police officer training programs around the state.
“I tell them it’s one thing to have a good rapport with people in the community ... but you’re not going to make a lot of friends pulling people over, but that’s your job. Whether it’s the police chief’s daughter or your next door neighbor. It doesn’t matter. It’s your job to pull them over,” he said.
Mr. Converse said he’s built a closer relationship with local police department since his son’s death and appreciates the stance taken by Chief John LaCross.
“I think the chief is right on track with what he’s doing. I think a lot of it is preventative. You’re going to hear the criticism everywhere you go, but it’s still your job,” Mr. Converse said.


Comments
GoodCitizen1 3 months, 1 week ago
The BPD is not typical, and in my opinion, they are preying on the good citizens of the town they serve. I have lived in Barrington for 7 years with my family and my four children and I want the best for this town. I have been a model citizen all my life. I was raised to respect law enforcement tremendously. The level of traffic enforcement in Barrington is ridiculous though. It is naive to see cars pulled over multiple times every single day and not understand that this is about revenue. The housewives, taxpayers, working citizens, and good people of Barrington, traveling 32 mph in a 25 zone, or not coming to a COMPLETE stop (are you serious? How many of us come to an actual complete stop as required by law?) are being harassed pure and simple.
To brag that the police only ticket 1 to every 3 of the stops means little when you pull over 10x the number of cars. As far as "discretion", well, that can also be a license for abuse of power and uneven enforcement. I would prefer discretion stay in the courts and Judiciary rather than in the hands of a police officer. History is clear in that the police need controls put on them or abuse is common. Discretion means the police are judges and I know from personal firsthand experience that Barrington police officers are no more perfect than the average citizen, some are less.
IF you travel 1 mph over the limit you are breaking the law. IF you do not come to an absolute complete stop, you are breaking the law. By this logic, almost everyone breaks the law and it allows the police to cite and collect at will, changing the role from law enforcment to revenue collection.
My lifetime of respect for police officers has been tested here in Barrington, and I'm sorry to say that I have little respect for this type of police work. Aggressive enforcement is fine... Let's see more patrols between 9pm and 4am. Lets scan license plates for stolen cars (technology available). It indicts an entire populace to insist that officers pull over two cars per shift!
My heart goes out to the Converse family and I have the most respect for them and sympathy for their loss. But Barrington youth are out of control and "active enforcement" of people going to work (I was pulled over at 7:00 am going 34 mph in a 25 zone) will do nothing to change this fact.
This is my opinion expressed in accordance with my first ammendment rights.
imjustsayin 3 months, 1 week ago
This ongoing harassment is Barrington Police version of community outreach. Also, equal distribution of bogus tickets is good cover for a more serious selective enforcement problem.
GoodCitizen1 3 months, 1 week ago
That's a very good point. Also, excessive stops and a smaller percentage of citations opens up the BPD officers to claims of selective enforcement, and potential discrimination (an important issue in an affluent lilly white town), irrespective of whether it actually happens or not.
I would love to see ACTUAL DATA of traffic stops, citations, accidents, arrests per month. Do more frequent traffic stops actually reduce accident rates? Worse, The article cites "Strong support" but that came from ONE person who was understandably biased. What is the actual level of support for this in the community?
Last night I came home late and there were no BPD cruisers to be seen anywhere. Then this morning, on my way to work at about 7:00 am, I passed TWO BPD cruisers, one at the white church and another further down 114. Both cars were with radar on and looking for bad guys. The EXTREME majority of people are on their way to work at this time. The crime stoppers argument looks weak compared to the revenue seeking argument based on one man's anecdotal observations of one day in Barrington.
The net effect of this policy will likely be that the police will be resented and that is the last thing a community needs.
imjustsayin 3 months, 1 week ago
The excessive ticketing is not for financial puposes (the chief is not pressing to boost town revenues), rather it is for justification purposes (the chief is pressing to justify the staff).
Barrington residents are harassed by traffic quotas (when you must stop a certain number of drivers per shift, that's called a quota) in order to give the officers a full day's work, as the chief says. But the well-equipped Barrington Police force (have you seen their new military Hummer?) can't stop much crime because there just isn't much crime in Barrington to stop. You must admit though ... we have become quite accomplished in converting our well-trained law enforcement officials into meter maids. (They should warn them about this at the acadamy.)
Barrington is a nice, small bedroom community and it is chock full of law abiding citizens. The town has over 30 law enforcement professionals on staff fighting all this crime that isn't (unless you consider low speed travel with a defective tail light to be a worthy caper). We shouldn't laugh because there is some miniscule level of danger being avoided here (and we are paying for all this nonsense ... by the way).
Supply creates its own demand ... and in this case our oversupply of well rested police officers, in their sporty cruisers with all the hi-tech gadgets creates its own demand for at least SOME criminals. So put down your Wall Street Journal and get out there with your crooked headlight ... and consider yourself a prime suspect.
We can all sleep well ... knowing that Barrington has the brightest bulbs in the state ... no pun intended.
Sign in to comment
Or login with:
OpenID